Karl Marx and the Rule of Law - 3094 Words

PUBLIC LAW ASSIGNMENT WORD COUNT: 2964 The rule of law plays a big role in the development of the western democratic order. A vague concept of rule of law started evolving more than 2000 years ago, at the time of Aristotle . Later a strong assertion of rule of law was laid down by chief justice Coke, who was dismissed from the bench for asserting the Supremacy of Law above the King. However his views were later accepted by the parliament when it passed the Petition of Rights in 1688, and with the passage of time and rise of territorial states in the 16th century the Law of England manifested it self as a supreme entity. Since then the concept of rule of law has gained different interpretations over the years, especially†¦show more content†¦This is because Marx believed that the bourgeois class maintains discrimination throughout the society as a vehicle to uphold division of classes. He further elaborates by reasoning that the bourgeois class does so to maintain a certain power and relevance. Collins agreed with Marx’s perception of law, saying that, â€Å"Far from hastening the revolution, the welfare state undermines efforts to create working class solidarity. By preventing the fullest development of the material degradation of the working class and by providing a limited immunity from the vicissitudes of economic crises, a welfare state delays the formation of class consciousness and thus prevents a revolutionary situation from arising†¦Ã¢â‚¬ [1] Just like other interpretations, Marx’s perception towards the Rule of Law is open to criticisms. He is under the impression that with this doctrine, the government is able to silently exercise the abuse of power. Referring to the question, Marx is of the opinion that the rule of law is inefficient, and rarely, if not at all exercised correctly. The question is, how true is Marx’s narrow interpretation towards the rule of law? The rule of law in its modern sense owes a great deal to Professor AV Dicey-The Father of modern English constitutional law. In his book, Introduction to the study of the Law of the Constitution, he states the three postulates of the rule of law: 1. â€Å"No man is punishableShow MoreRelatedMarx Vs. Locke1476 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿Marx vs. Locke Work is something we do on a regular basis, it’s what gets us through our day and makes us who we are. In class, we discussed two authors who had a viewpoint on the idea of work. Rousseau and Marx express their opinions of the theory of work in their own writings. In Karl Marx’s reading called The Communist Manifesto he explains the differences and similarities between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat people. In Rousseau’s reading called Discourse on the Origins of InequalityRead MoreWhy Is Karl Marx So Anti Semitic?805 Words   |  4 PagesIf we were to read On the Jewish Question by Karl Marx for the first time we would probably ask Why is Karl Marx so anti-Semitic?†. If you wanted to read Marx just for fun than yes it would see so, but if you were a serious reader than you would know this is not true. The questions any reader should ask him/or herself is what did nineteenth-century Germans mean by the Jewish question? What did the phrase mean to Marx ? What was Marx s own experience of Jews and Judaism outside his immediateRead MoreCompare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx843 Words   |  4 PagesCompare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx In the idea of human nature; origin of state, the nature of government, the rights of regulation can be drawn as the reflection of insightful philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Karl Marx. By understanding this within the context of human nature, we can see their ideas play to how they perceive a modern philosophy. Karl Marxs Communist Manifesto illustrates the desire to build a society without economicRead MoreWhy Can Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx Be Regarded as Structuralists?1307 Words   |  6 Pagessocieties think and behave differently because they have learned different rules about how to behave and think. In sociology we have three sociological perspectives: functionalism, structuralism and social interactionism but In this essay I would only be focusing on one perspective and that is structuralism, which analyses the way society as a whole fits together. I would also be explaining on how both Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim contributed to structuralis m and why they can be regardedRead MoreKarl Marx and Communism Essay1184 Words   |  5 PagesKarl Marx and Communism Were Karl Marx ideas on communism moral? It is quite obvious that some societies do or did believe that communism was a good way of life. Even though there are many drawbacks to communism there are still some advantages. Karl Marx is a man of intrigue he only did what he wanted to and not what others wanted him to do. Upon completion of my research I feel that Marx was a very bright man. His ideas may not be all together but a man that can introduce communism to theRead MoreThe Conflict Perspective Views Society Less as a Cohesive System and More as an Arena of Conflict and Power Struggles. Compare and Contrast the Main Tenets of the Functionalist and Conflict Perspectives.1319 Words   |  6 Pagesfocused on how various features of social structure function to maintain social order and equilibrium. In contrast to Durkheim’s views, conflict theorist Karl Marx (1818-1883) saw the society as being in a state of conflict which is as a result of social inequalities. Marx bas ed his work on inequality, focusing on inequality under capitalism. Marx argued that the production of goods and services within society is set up so that great benefits are produced for a minority dominant group, the BourgeoisieRead MoreKarl Marx And The German Political System1427 Words   |  6 PagesKarl Marx was born on May 5th 1818 in Trier, Germany, which was then known as the Kingdom of Prussia. Karl was a philosopher, economist, sociologist, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. His work in economics laid the basis for much of the current understanding of labor and it’s relation to capital, and subsequent economic thought. He was born into a wealthy upper middle-class family. He attended school at the University of Bonn and later he studied law and philosophy at the University of BerlinRead MoreComparison between Two Political Thinkers and and their Understanding of Private Property1464 Words   |  6 Pagesrationality and industry; the powers of government mus t be separated because virtue is always in short comings, but prerogative, which depends on virtue in judgment, it must be retained by the executive because of the necessary imperfections of the rule of law; and, the right of resistance to illegitimate government presupposes the exercise of restraint and rational judgment by the people. He believed that private property is a natural right, and one of the most significant ones at that. Which is whyRead MoreEmile Durkheim vs. Karl Marx1689 Words   |  7 Pages------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Emile Durkheim vs. Karl Marx Durkheim vs. Marx Introduction: For so many years, authorities from each field have deliberated normative theories to explain what holds the society together. Almost each specialist, from structural functionalism, positivism and conflict theory perspective, had contributed their works trying to illustrate main problematic to our society. In one way, one of the EmileRead MoreEssay about Karl Heinrich marx and Social-Conflict Analysis651 Words   |  3 Pagessome people and disadvantages others. This analysis draws heavily on the ideas of the great Karl Marx. Karl Heinrich Marx was a German philosopher, social scientist, and revolutionist whose writings formed the beginning of the basic ideas known as Marxism. He was born on May 5, 1818, in a place called Trier in Prussia. Marx attended the University of Bonn and later the University at Berlin, where he studied law, while majoring in history and philosophy to follow in his father’s footsteps of becoming